(b) The provisions of K.S.A. 20-3201 through 20-3207, and amendments thereto shall expire on June 30, 2010.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 1; May 25.
(b) For the purposes of K.S.A. 20-3201 through 20-3207, and amendments thereto, the commission shall not be subject to the Kansas open meetings act as provided in K.S.A. 75-4317 et seq., and amendments thereto.
(c) As used in K.S.A. 20-3201 through 20-3207, and amendments thereto:
(1) "Lawyer" means an attorney registered as active pursuant to supreme court rule.
(2) "Judge" means a current or retired Kansas judge of the district court and a current or retired judge of the Kansas court of appeals.
(3) "Justice" means a current or retired justice of the Kansas supreme court.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 2; May 25.
(a) To improve the judicial performance of individual judges and justices and thereby improve the judiciary as a whole;
(b) where judges and justices are subject to retention elections, to disseminate the results from the judicial performance evaluation process to enable voters to make informed decisions about continuing judges and justices in office; and
(c) to protect judicial independence while promoting public accountability of the judiciary.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 3; May 25.
(a) Create surveys of court users who have directly observed the judge's or justice's performance or interacted with the judge or justice, including attorneys, litigants, jurors and other persons the commission deems appropriate. The surveys shall be dispersed, collected and tabulated by an independent organization or in any other manner that insures confidentiality. The surveys shall ask those surveyed to evaluate the judges and justices on such judge's or justice's ability, integrity, impartiality, communication skills, professionalism, temperament and administrative capacity suitable to the jurisdiction and level of court;
(b) develop clear, measurable performance standards upon which the survey questions are based;
(c) develop dissemination plans that:
(1) Protect confidentiality when the judicial performance evaluation is used only for self-improvement;
(2) make the judicial performance evaluation results widely available when they are to be used to assist voters in evaluating the performance of judges and justices subject to retention elections; and
(3) make public recommendations regarding whether or not to retain judges and justices subject to retention elections;
(d) develop a procedure for judges and justices to receive and respond to survey results before such results are made public;
(e) establish a mechanism to incorporate evaluation results in designing judicial education programs; and
(f) adopt rules for implementation of the judicial performance evaluation process, subject to approval by the Kansas supreme court.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 4; May 25.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 5; May 25.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 6; May 25.
History: L. 2006, ch. 195, § 7; May 25.
History: L. 2007, ch. 24, § 1; July 1.